計算語言學及心理語言學初探__臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統

心理詞彙,中文,基本詞彙,上位詞,下位詞,mental lexicon,Mandarin Chinese,basic level,superordinate level,subordinate level,中文基本詞彙:計算語言學及心理語言學 ... 資料載入處理中... 跳到主要內容 臺灣博碩士論文加值系統 ::: 網站導覽| 首頁| 關於本站| 聯絡我們| 國圖首頁| 常見問題| 操作說明 English |FB專頁 |Mobile 免費會員 登入| 註冊 功能切換導覽列 (165.22.106.144)您好！臺灣時間：2022/06/2202:10 字體大小：       ::: 詳目顯示 recordfocus 第1筆/ 共1筆  /1頁 論文基本資料 外文摘要 目次 參考文獻 電子全文 紙本論文 QRCode 本論文永久網址: 複製永久網址Twitter研究生:劉貫立研究生(外文):Liu,Guan-Li論文名稱:中文基本詞彙:計算語言學及心理語言學初探論文名稱(外文):Basic-LevelWordsinChinese:AComputationalandPsycholinguisticInvestigation指導教授:麥傑、吳俊雄指導教授(外文):Myers,James、Wu,Jiun-Shiung口試委員:戴浩一、林惠玲口試委員(外文):Tai,JamesH-Y.、Lin,Huei-Ling口試日期:2016-06-21學位類別:碩士校院名稱:國立中正大學系所名稱:語言學研究所學門:人文學門學類:語言學類論文種類:學術論文論文出版年:2016畢業學年度:104語文別:英文論文頁數:201中文關鍵詞:心理詞彙、中文、基本詞彙、上位詞、下位詞外文關鍵詞:mentallexicon、MandarinChinese、basiclevel、superordinatelevel、subordinatelevel相關次數: 被引用:0點閱:579評分:下載:129書目收藏:0 Althoughbasic-levelwordsplayanimportantroleinlanguageprocessing,surprisinglyfewdirectempiricalstudiestelluswhatarethebasic-levelwordsinChinese,andtheirsuperordinate-levelwordsorsubordinate-levelwordsofthesewords.Forthisreason,thisstudyinvestigatestheChinesebasic-levelwords,andthesuperordinate-levelwordsaswellassubordinate-levelwordsofthesebasic-levelvocabularyinadults’mentallexicons.AsRoschetal.(1976)argues,thebasic-levelwordsaremoregeneralandconcrete.Basedonthisdefinition,morestudiestriedtoinvestigatethebasiclevelsinvariedaspects,suchasmorphology.However,therearefewempiricalstudiesofbasiclevels,andmostofthemfocusedonEnglishwords.Thebasic-levelwordsinChinesearesupposedtobealittledifferentfromthewordsinEnglishforthefollowingthreereasons:First,thecommonbasic-levelwordsmayvaryindistinctlanguages.Forexample,LAMPisacommonbasic-levelwordinRoschetal.(1976),butthismaybechangedinChinese.Second,thesimilarproblemsareraisedwhenwethinkofthesubordinate-levelvocabularyofthesebasic-levelwords.Forexample,SUGARMAPLEisunfamiliartous.Last,lotsofsubordinatelevelsinChinesearecompoundwordswhichincludethebasic-levelwordsastheircomponentsasTai(2007)claims.Moreover,Jiang(2000)providesChinesebasic-levelwordsandthesuperordinatesaswellassubordinatesinChinese,butshefocusesonchildren’mentallexicons.Bothcomputationallinguisticandpsycholinguisticmethodsareadoptedinthisstudy.Incomputationallinguisticpart,thecomputationalmethodisusedtocomputethewordfrequenciesinversion4.0ofAcademiaSinicaBalancedCorpusofModernChinesewhichcontainstenmillionswordsandvariedgenres.Thissourceprovidesamoreconvincinglistofhigh-frequencywords.Withthewordfrequencies,thecommonsuperordinate-levelcategoriesofthehigh-frequencywords(e.g.MUSICALINSTRUMENT)arefoundandusedinfurtherexperiments.InExperiment1and2,questionnairesaredistributedtotheparticipantsforobtainingthebasic-levelwordsandsubordinate-levelwordsrespectively.Participantsneededtowritedownseveralfirst-come-into-mindobjectsforeachsuperordinate-levelcategoryinExperiment1.Thetypicalmembersinsuperordinate-levelcategoriesandthebasic-levelwordswereaffirmedinExperiment1.Afterthis,thesebasic-levelwordswereprovidedasstimuliinExperiment2,andthesubordinate-levelwordswereaffirmedintheresults.ChinesewordsinthreedifferentlevelswereprovidedinExperiment3forfeaturelisting.Withthesethreeexperiments,thewordlistofChinesewordsinthreedifferentlevelswereaffirmed.Moreover,severalpointsareraisedinthisstudy.First,thebasic-levelwordsdonotnecessarilyhavehigherwordfrequenciesthanwordsinotherlevels.Second,thecompoundsubordinate-levelwordsnotonlyaffectpeopleinprocessing,butalsotheconceptualknowledgeofsubordinate-levelwords.Thehierarchicalstructuresofwordsareadoptedinseveraltasksinotherlanguages,suchasrecalltasks.Therefore,theresultsareavailabletofacilitateotherrelatedresearchesinChinesenow.Duetothespecialrepresentationofsubordinate-levelwordsinChinese,theresultsoftaskswillbemoreinterestingthanotherlanguages. ChapterOne:Introduction11.1Thebasic-levelwordsinChinese11.2Purposeofthepresentstudy21.3Organizationofthisthesis4ChapterTwo:TheoreticalBackgroundandRelatedWork52.1Overview52.2Thehierarchicalstructuresofwords62.2.1Thebenefitsofhierarchies62.2.2Thebasiclevel92.2.3Typicalandatypicalmembers:theissuesoffamilyresemblancesandprototypes112.3MorphologyinChinese:whatisaword?172.4Processingincompoundwords212.5Previousexperimentalstudiesoffindingthewordsatdifferentlevels222.5.1Findingtheproperobjectsasstimuliforfeaturelistingexperiments222.5.2Featurelistingexperimentsinthehierarchicalstructuresofwords232.6Researchquestions26ChapterThree:RetrievingDataandComputingFrequencies273.1Overview273.2Thecommonsuperordinate-levelcategoriesinChinese283.3ThefrequenciesofEnglishwordsandthesuperordinate-levelwordsinChinese39ChapterFour:Experiments474.1Overview474.2Experiment1:Freelistingforthebasic-levelwords484.2.1Thegoaloftheexperiment484.2.2Method494.2.2.1Thepilotstudies494.2.2.2Participants504.2.2.3Stimuli504.2.2.4Procedure514.2.3Results514.2.3.1Theresultsofbiologicalcategories544.2.3.2Theresultsofnonbiologicalcategories574.2.4Discussion664.3Experiment2:Freelistingforthesubordinate-levelwords684.3.1Thegoaloftheexperiment694.3.2Method694.3.2.1Participants694.3.2.2Stimuli704.3.2.3Procedure734.3.3Results734.3.3.1Theresultsofbiologicalbasic-levelcategories754.3.3.2Theresultsofnonbiologicalbasic-levelcategories794.3.4Discussion894.4Experiment3:Features944.4.1Thegoaloftheexperiment944.4.2Method954.4.2.2Participants954.4.2.3Stimuli954.4.2.4Procedure974.4.3Results994.4.4Discussion109ChapterFive:GeneralDiscussionandConclusion1135.1Overview1135.2Computationallinguisticinvestigation1135.3Psycholinguisticinvestigation1155.4.TheroleofexperimentalstudiesofChinesewordsinhierarchicalstructures1185.5Implicationforfuturestudies1185.6Conclusion119References123AppendixA.TheConcreteObjectsPassingtheThreeCriteria129AppendixB.TheExplanationofExperiment1147AppendixC.TheBiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment1148AppendixD.TheNonbiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment1149AppendixE.TheExplanationofExperiment2151AppendixF.TheBiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment2152AppendixG.TheNonbiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment2154AppendixH.TheStimuliUsedinExperiment3159AppendixI.TheExplanationforFeaturingListinginExperiment3162AppendixJ.TheSampleQuestionnaireforJudgmentinExperiment3163AppendixK.TheNonbiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment3165AppendixL.TheBiologicalCategoriesResultsofExperiment3185 Battig,W.F.,andW.E.Montague(1969).CategoryNormsofVerbalItemsin56Categories:AReplicationandExtensionoftheConnecticutCategoryNorms.JournalofExperimentalPsychology,80(3),1-46.Baxter,W.H.,andL.Sagart(1998).WordFormationinOldChinese.InJ.L.Packward(Ed.)NewApproachestoChineseWordFormation:Morphology,PhonologyandtheLexiconinModernandAncientChinese.NewYork:WalterdeGruyter.Beach,L.R.(1964a).CueProbabilismandInferenceBehavior.PsychologicalMonographs:GeneralandApplied,78(5-6),1-20.Beach,L.R.(1964b).Recognition,Assimilation,andIdentificationofObjects.PsychologicalMonographs:GeneralandApplied,78(5-6),21-37.Berlin,B.(1972).SpeculationsontheGrowthofEthnobotanicalNomenclature.LanguageinSociety,1(01),51-86.Berlin,B.,D.E.Breedlove,andP.H.Raven(1974).PrinciplesofTzeltalPlantClassification:AnIntroductiontotheBotanicalEthnographyofaMayan-SpeakingPeopleofHighland,Chiapas.NewYork:AcademicPress.Booij,G.(2012).TheGrammarofWords:AnIntroductiontoLinguisticMorphology.UK:OxfordUniversityPress.Bower,G.H.(1970).OrganizationalFactorsinMemory.CognitivePsychology,1(1),18-46.Bower,G.H.,M.C.Clark,A.M.LesgoldandD.Winzenz(1969).HierarchicalRetrievalSchemesinRecallofCategorizedWordLists.JournalofVerbalLearningandVerbalBehavior,8(3),323-343.Brysbaert,M.,andB.New(2009).MovingbeyondKučeraandFrancis:ACriticalEvaluationofCurrentWordFrequencyNormsandtheIntroductionofaNewandImprovedWordfrequencyMeasureforAmericanEnglish.BehaviorResearchMethods,41(4),977-990.Chang,J.-H.(張榮興)(2015).跨時空手語詞彙認知結構比較[CognitiveStructureinWordFormationacrossSignLanguages].Taipei:CranePublishingCo.Chen,K.-J.,C.-R.Huang,L.-P.Chang,andH.-L.Hsu(1996).SinicaCorpus:DesignMethodologyforBalancedCorpora.Language,InformationandComputation(PACLIC11),167-176.Chen,W.-T.,S.-C.Lin,S.-L.Huang,Y.-S.Chung,andK.-J.Chen(2010,August).E-HowNetandAutomaticConstructionofaLexicalOntology.InProceedingsofthe23rdInternationalConferenceonComputationalLinguistics:Demonstrations(pp.45-48).AssociationforComputationalLinguistics.Chao,Y.R.(1965).AGrammarofSpokenChinese.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.Collins,A.M.,andM.R.Quillian(1969).RetrievalTimefromSemanticMemory.JournalofVerbalLearningandVerbalBehavior,8(2),240-247.Conrad,C.(1972).CognitiveEconomyinSemanticMemory.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:General,92(2),149-154.CKIP(ChineseKnowledgeInformationProcessingGroup)(詞庫小組).(1995/1998).中央研究院平衡語料庫的內容與說明[TheContentandIllustrationofAcademiaSinicaCorpus].(TechniqueReportno.95-02/98-04).Taipei:AcademiaSinica.CKIP(ChineseKnowledgeInformationProcessingGroup).(2009).LexicalSemanticRepresentationandSemanticComposition:AnIntroductiontoE-HowNet.(TechniqueReportno.2009-01).Taipei:AcademiaSinica.Dai,J.X.-L.(1998).Syntactic,Phonological,MorphologicalWordsinChinese.InJ.L.Packward(Ed.)NewApproachestoChineseWordFormation:Morphology,PhonologyandtheLexiconinModernandAncientChinese.NewYork:WalterdeGruyter.DiSciullo,A.M.,andE.Williams(1987).OntheDefinitionofWord.Cambridge:MITPress.Duanmu,S.(1998).WordhoodinChinese.InJ.L.Packward(Ed.)NewApproachestoChineseWordFormation:Morphology,PhonologyandtheLexiconinModernandAncientChinese.NewYork:WalterdeGruyter.Eimas,P.D.,andP.C.Quinn(1994).StudiesontheFormationofPerceptuallyBasedBasic‐LevelCategoriesinYoungInfants.ChildDevelopment,65(3),903-917.Fellbaum,C.(Ed.)(1998).WordNet:AnElectronicLexicalDatabase.Cambridge:MITPress.FrancisW.N.,andH.Kučera(1964/1971/1979).AStandardCorpusofPresent-DayEditedAmericanEnglish,forusewithDigitalComputers.Providence,RhodeIsland:BrownUniversityPressFu,H.Q.(符淮青)(2003).現代漢語詞彙[ModernMandarinChineseWord].Beijing:PekingUniversityPress.Gagné,C.L.,andT.L.Spalding(2004).EffectofRelationAvailabilityontheInterpretationandAccessofFamiliarNoun–NounCompounds.BrainandLanguage,90(1),478-486.Gagné,C.L.andT.L.Spalding(2009).ConstituentIntegrationduringtheProcessingofCompoundWords:DoesItInvolvetheUseofRelationalStructures?.JournalofMemoryandLanguage,60(1),20-35.Geeraerts,D.(2006).ProspectsandProblemsofPrototypeTheory.InD.Geeraerts(Ed.),CognitiveLinguistics:BasicReadings(Vol.34)(pp141-165).Berlin:WalterdeGruyter.Goldstone,R.L.andA.Kersten(2003).ConceptsandCategorization.InA.F.HealyandR.W.Proctor(Eds.),HandbookofPsychology(Vol.4)(pp.599-621).NewJersey:JohnWileyandSons.Gopnik,A.,andA.N.Meltzoff(1992).CategorizationandNaming:Basic‐LevelSortinginEighteen‐Month‐OldsandItsRelationtoLanguage.ChildDevelopment,63(5),1091-1103.Henderson,L.(1992).OnMentalRepresentationofMorphologyandItsDiagnosisbyMeasuresofVisualAccessSpeed.InW.Marslen-Wilson(Ed.)LexicalRepresentationandProcess.Cambridge:TheMITPress.Henley,N.M.(1969).APsychologicalStudyoftheSemanticsofAnimalTerms.JournalofVerbalLearningandVerbalBehavior,8(2),176-184.Her,O.S.(2012).DistinguishingClassifiersandMeasureWords:AMathematicalPerspectiveandImplications.Lingua,122(14),1668-1691.Her,O.S.,andJ.S.Wu(2015).TaxonomyofNumeralClassifiersandMeasureWords:AFormalSemanticProposal.Manuscriptsubmittedforpublication.Huang,C.R.,andK.J.Chen(1995).AcademicSinicaBalancedCorpus.TechnicalReport95-02/98-04.AcademicSinica.Huang,C.-R.,andS.-K.Hsieh.(2010).InfrastructureforCross-LingualKnowledgeRepresentation─TowardsMultilingualisminLinguisticStudies.TaiwanNSC-grantedResearchProject(NSC96-2411-H-003-061-MY3)Jarema,G.(2006).CompoundRepresentationandProcessing:ACross-LanguagePerspective.InG.Libben,andG.Jarema(Eds.)TheRepresentationandProcessingofCompoundWords(pp.45-70).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Ji,H.,C.L.Gagné,andT.L.Spalding(2011).BenefitsandCostsofLexicalDecompositionandSemanticIntegrationduringtheProcessingofTransparentandOpaqueEnglishCompounds.JournalofMemoryandLanguage,65(4),406-430.Jiang,Y.-W.(2000).Basic-LevelEffectsinChineseLexicon(Unpublishedmaster’sthesis).NationalTsingHuaUniversity,Hsinchu,Taiwan.Jolicoeur,P.,M.A.Gluck,andS.M.Kosslyn(1984).PicturesandNames:MakingtheConnection.Cognitivepsychology,16(2),243-275.Klibanoff,R.S.,andS.R.Waxman(2000).BasicLevelObjectCategoriesSupporttheAcquisitionofNovelAdjectives:EvidencefromPreschool‐AgedChildren.Childdevelopment,71(3),649-659.Kovecses,Z.(2006).Language,Mind,andCulture:APracticalIntroduction.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Labov,W.(1973).TheBoundariesofWordsandTheirMeanings.InC.-J.N.BaileyandR.W.Shuy(Eds.)NewWaysofAnalyzingVariationinEnglish(pp340-373).WashingtonDC:GeorgetownUniversityPress.Lassaline,M.E.,E.J.Wisniewski,andD.L.Medin(1992).BasicLevelsinArtificialandNaturalCategories:AreAllBasicLevelsCreatedEqual.InB.Burns(Ed.)Percepts,ConceptsandCategories:TheRepresentationandProcessingofInformation(pp327-378).Amsterdam:North-Holland.Li,C.N.,andS.A.Thompson(1981).MandarinChinese:AFunctionalReferenceGrammar.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.Libben,G.(2006a).ReadingComplexMorphologicalStructures.InS.Andrews(Ed.)FromInkmarkstoIdeas:CurrentIssuesinLexicalProcessing(pp.259-274),NewYork:PsychologyPress.Libben,G.(2006b).WhyStudyCompoundProcessing?AnOverviewofThisIssues.InG.Libben,andG.Jarema(Eds.)TheRepresentationandProcessingofCompoundWords(pp.1-22).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Lin,H.-M.(2006).HypernymsandHyponymsinDiscourse(Unpublishedmaster’sthesis).NationalChungChengUniversity,Chiayi,Taiwan.Malt,B.C.,andE.E.Smith(1982).TheRoleofFamiliarityinDeterminingTypicality.Memory&Cognition,10(1),69-75.Markman,A.B.,andE.J.Wisniewski(1997).SimilarandDifferent:TheDifferentiationofBasic-LevelCategories.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:Learning,Memory,andCognition,23(1),54-70.McRae,K.,G.S.Cree,M.S.Seidenberg,andC.McNorgan(2005).SemanticFeatureProductionNormsforaLargeSetofLivingandNonlivingThings.BehaviorResearchMethods,37(4),547-559.Mervis,C.B.,andE.Rosch(1981).CategorizationofNaturalObjects.AnnualReviewofPsychology,32(1),89-115.Mervis,C.B.,andM.A.Crisafi(1982).OrderofAcquisitionofSubordinate-,Basic-,andSuperordinate-LevelCategories.ChildDevelopment,53(1),258-266.Miller,G.A.(1995).WordNet:ALexicalDatabaseforEnglish.CommunicationsoftheACM,38(11),39-41.Murphy,G.(Ed.)(2002).TheBigBookofConcepts.Cambridge:MITpress.Murphy,G.L.,andD.L.Medin(1985).TheRoleofTheoriesinConceptualCoherence.PsychologicalReview,92(3),289-316.NewsCorpus2.0.RetrievedApril19,2016from.http://hunteq.com/ttsnewsc/ttsnewskmOxfordEnglishDictionary.RetrievedNovember24,2015from.http://dictionary.oed.comPackard,J.L.(2000).TheMorphologyofChinese:ALinguisticandCognitiveApproach.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.Palmer,S.E.(2003).VisualPerceptionofObjects.InA.F.HealyandR.W.Proctor(Eds.)HandbookofPsychology(Vol.4)(pp.179-211).NewJersey:JohnWileyandSons.Pustejovsky,J.(1991).TheGenerativeLexicon.ComputationalLinguistics,17(4),409-441.Qi,S.(祁淑玲)(2014).國際漢語教學用基本層次範疇詞彙認知的順序性–以人體類名詞為例[TheCognitiveSequenceofBasic-LevelCategoryVocabularyinInternationalChineseTeaching–AnExampleofWordsRelatedtoHumanBody].AppliedLinguistics,(4),85-90.Reed,S.K.(1972).PatternRecognitionandCategorization.Cognitivepsychology,3(3),382-407.Reed,S.K.(Ed.)(1988).Cognition:TheoryandApplications.California:Wadsworth.Rosch,E.H.(1973).OntheInternalStructureofPerceptualandSemanticCategories.InT.E.Moore(Ed.)CognitiveDevelopmentandtheAcquisitionofLanguage(pp111-144),NewYork:AcademicPress.Rosch,E.(1975a).CognitiveRepresentationsofSemanticCategories.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:General,104(3),192-233.Rosch,E.(1975b).TheNatureofMentalCodesforColorCategories.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:HumanPerceptionandPerformance,1(4),303-322.Rosch,E.(1999).PrinciplesofCategorization.InE.Margolis,andS.Laurence(Eds.)Concepts:CoreReadings(pp189-206).Cambridge:TheMITPress.Rosch,E.andC.B.Mervis(1975).FamilyResemblances:StudiesintheInternalStructureofCategories.CognitivePsychology,7(4),573-605.Rosch,E.,C.B.Mervis,W.D.Gray,D.M.,Johnson,andP.Boyes-Braem.(1976).BasicObjectsinNaturalCategories.CognitivePsychology,8(3),382-439.Sapir,E.(1921).Language.NewYork:Harcourt,Brace.Smith,E.E.,andD.L.Medin(1981).CategoriesandConcepts.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Stuessy,T.F.(1990).PlantTaxonomy:TheSystematicEvaluationofComparativeData.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress.Taft,M.(2003).MorphologicalRepresentationasaCorrelationbetweenFormandMeaning.InE.M.H.Assink,andD.Sandra(Eds.)ReadingComplexWords(pp.113-137).NewYork:Springer.Tai,H-Y.(1994).ChineseClassifierSystemsandHumanCategorization.InhonorofWilliamS.-Y.Wang:InterdisciplinaryStudiesonLanguageandLanguageChange,479-494.Tai,H-Y.(戴浩一)(2007).中文構詞與句法的概念結構[ConceptualizationinChineseGrammar].JournalofChineseLanguageTeaching,4,1-30.Tanaka,J.W.,andM.Taylor(1991).ObjectCategoriesandExpertise:IstheBasicLevelintheEyeoftheBeholder?.CognitivePsychology,23(3),457-482.Taylor,J.R.(2003).LinguisticCategorization.3rdedn.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Tversky,A.,andGati,I.(1978).StudiesofSimilarity.InE.RoschandB.B.Lloyd(Eds.)CognitionandCategorization(pp.79-98).Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates,Inc.Tversky,B.,andK.Hemenway(1984).Objects,Parts,andCategories.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:General,113(2),169-193.Ungerer,F.,andH.J.Schmid(Eds.)(2006).AnIntroductiontoCognitivelinguistics.NewYork:Routledge.Zhang,B.,andD.Peng(1992)DecomposedStorageintheChineseLexicon.InH.-C.Chen,O.J.L.Tzeng(Eds.)LanguageProcessinginChinese(pp.131-149).Amsterdam:North-Holland.Zhang,N.N.(2013).ClassifierStructuresinMandarinChinese(Vol.263).NewYork:WalterdeGruyter.Zhou,X.,andW.Marslen-Wilson(1994).Words,MorphemesandSyllablesintheChineseMentalLexicon.LanguageandCognitiveProcesses,9(3),393-422.Zhou,X.,andW.Marslen-Wilson(1995).MorphologicalStructureintheChineseMentalLexicon.LanguageandCognitiveProcesses,10(6),545-600.Zhou,X.,andW.Marslen-Wilson(2000).LexicalRepresentationofCompoundWords:Cross-LinguisticEvidence.Psychologia,43(1),47-66.Zhou,X.,W.Marslen-Wilson,M.Taft,andH.Shu(1999).Morphology,Orthography,andPhonologyReadingChineseCompoundWords.LanguageandCognitiveProcesses,14(5-6),525-565.Zhou,X.,Z.Ye,H.Cheung,andH.-C.Chen(2009).ProcessingtheChineseLanguage:AnIntroduction.LanguageandCognitiveProcesses,24(7-8),929-946.Zubin,D.,andK.M.Köpcke(1986).GenderandFolkTaxonomy:TheIndexicalRelationbetweenGrammaticalandLexicalCategorization.InC.G.Craig(Ed.)NounClassesandCategorization:ProceedingsofaSymposiumonCategorizationandNounClassification,Eugene,Oregon,October1983(Vol.7)(pp.139-180).Philadelphia:JohnBenjaminsPublishingCompany.  電子全文  國圖紙本論文 推文 網路書籤 推薦 評分 引用網址 轉寄                                                                                                                                                                                                                    top 相關論文 相關期刊 熱門點閱論文 1. 台灣手語名詞範疇化─上位詞的呈現 2. 探索心理詞彙的結構:從中文失語病入手   無相關期刊   1. 中文時間觀點的心理語言學處理 2. 中文顏色詞彙處理機制：心理語言學的實證 3. 中文分類詞與量詞之數學意涵:心理語言學的實證 4. 比較臺灣手語與中文手語的音韻系統 5. 中文多義詞的心理語言學處理 6. 從認知語言學觀點探討美妝商品包裝、品名與購買意願 7. 語言學習策略、語言學習動機及語言能力之相互關聯:以台灣公務人員為例 8. 台中市國中學生語言學習風格與語言學習策略關係之研究—以英語科為例 9. 語料庫及心理語言學為基礎之研究：以[Do/Make+Noun]為例 10. 現在我們是親戚了：臺灣華語中親屬稱謂泛化現象的認知語言學研究 11. 年輕人與長者在台語零指示詞理解之異同 12. 點亮咖啡香：從認知語言學理解風味的跨感官表達 13. LearningQuality-andQuantity-SensitiveStressinArtificialLanguages 14. 以計算語言學方法研究英文的認知基本名詞 15. 漢語失語症病人聲調錯誤之心理語言學研究     簡易查詢 | 進階查詢 | 熱門排行 | 我的研究室